HOME / CASE_STUDIES / CASE_06

// Case_study_06

Scaling internationally without breaking the GTM model

SERIES B · HR-TECH / WORKFLOW SAAS · $35M ARR

We created a global-to-local marketing operating model that allowed the company to enter three markets without fragmenting its positioning or reporting.

// Results_at_a_glance

What moved.

3 New markets entered
+45% Campaign-launch velocity
28% Of expansion-qualified pipeline from new regions in 12 months

// The_shape_of_the_change

One model, three new markets.

ONE_MODEL_THREE_NEW_MARKETSCORE MARKET → NEW MARKETS
COREMARKET_01MARKET_02MARKET_03

// Situation

Where it started.

The company had established traction in one core market and raised Series B capital to expand into new geographies. It had a growing marketing team, multiple country stakeholders, localized sales teams, and scattered agency support.

The risk was not a lack of marketing activity. The risk was that each region would create its own messaging, campaigns, reporting standards, and priorities, creating expensive duplication, inconsistent brand positioning, and no reliable comparison of performance across markets.

// The_objective

Create a scalable global marketing operating system: retain a coherent category position, localize only what needs localization, coordinate launches across markets, and give the executive team comparable performance data.

// What_I_did

The work, step by step.

01

Assessed market readiness by segment: local demand signals, buyer behavior, regulatory requirements, sales capacity, competitor strength, pricing, partner availability, and expected CAC/payback.

02

Built the global positioning and message architecture, with controlled localization guidance by market and vertical.

03

Developed a market-entry scorecard and launch framework covering audience, offer, proof, channel mix, budget, KPI targets, legal/compliance dependencies, and owners.

04

Rationalized regional agency relationships and created shared campaign, content, creative, and reporting standards.

05

Defined which assets should be centrally produced versus locally adapted.

06

Built a global dashboard for pipeline, cost per qualified opportunity, conversion, sales velocity, CAC/payback, and market readiness.

07

Designed team roles and governance: central demand generation, regional field/market leads, product marketing, lifecycle, content, and RevOps.

08

Recruited or helped transition to a permanent international marketing leader once the model was stable.

// Results_timeline

How the results built up.

First 90 days

Market-prioritization, global message architecture, launch governance, reporting standards

Clear decision on which 1–3 markets to enter first and why

By month 6

Coordinated market launches and centralized campaign operating system

30–50% improvement in campaign-launch velocity; less duplicated agency and content work

By month 9

First markets operating with comparable funnel and pipeline reporting

Qualified pipeline established in new markets; clear scale/adjust/stop decisions

By month 12

International GTM motion operational; team and local execution structure in place

Successful launches in 2–3 markets; 20–35% of qualified expansion pipeline from new geographies, depending on sales cycle

RANGES SHOW THE EXPECTED OUTCOME AT EACH STAGE. THE OUTCOME BELOW REPORTS THIS ENGAGEMENT.

// The_outcome

We created a global-to-local marketing operating model that allowed the company to enter three markets without fragmenting its positioning or reporting. Campaign-launch velocity increased 45%, every market reported against the same pipeline metrics, and the new regions generated 28% of expansion-qualified pipeline within 12 months.

// More_case_studies

Other engagements.

All_case_studies →
CASE_01 SERIES A · $3M ARR
2× Marketing-sourced qualified pipeline in 6 months

From founder-led marketing to qualified pipeline

VERTICAL SAAS Read_case_study →
CASE_02 SERIES A · $7M ARR
−28% CAC in six months

Fixing positioning and conversion before adding spend

DEVELOPER / TECHNICAL SAAS Read_case_study →
CASE_03 SERIES A–B · $12M ARR
11 → 6 MO CAC payback

Building scalable acquisition after Series A

COMPLIANCE / OPERATIONS SAAS Read_case_study →